Posts Tagged ‘Windows 7 Build 7264’
Windows 7 Build 7264: Netbook Edition

A couple of days ago, a group by the name of, “ModMyEee” created a release of Windows 7 RTM candidate build 7264 specifically for netbooks. To quote:
“The Eee7 is a special version of Windows 7 Ultimate, based on the last edition 7264, made by the group “ModMyEee”. It occupies only 1.49 GB of space on an installation USB drive and 4 GB when installed on the hard disk. It operates on any netbook and is faster than XP SP3! No major functionality has been removed; all networking capabilities remained intact, as does dardware support.”
Download via Rapidshare Links (Thanks to kevin2008 @ avaxhome):
http://rapidshare.com/files/255641842/b1u3eyes.Win.7.Netbook.Edition.part1.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/255657253/b1u3eyes.Win.7.Netbook.Edition.part2.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/255640985/b1u3eyes.Win.7.Netbook.Edition.part3.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/255730736/b1u3eyes.Win.7.Netbook.Edition.part4.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/255873844/b1u3eyes.Win.7.Netbook.Edition.part5.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/255875765/b1u3eyes.Win.7.Netbook.Edition.part6.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/255873871/b1u3eyes.Win.7.Netbook.Edition.part7.rar
Feel free to mirror these links!
-Stephen
Windows 7 RTM Candidate Build 7264 x86 and x64 Leak!
Caveat: Please take into account that this is an RTM candidate build which was rejected due to a showstopper bug being found. If you choose to install this build, I would highly recommend you don’t fully trust your data with it. Now with that out of the way…
I’ve been waiting for one of these RTM candidate builds to leak and finally, we have one! A forum by the name of VinylZine somehow got a hold of the ISOs for both x86 and x64 client. It’s amazing how this stuff turns up sometimes. If it wasn’t for WZor posting about it, I would’ve never found this site by its own accord. Anyway, here are torrents for each ISO along with their respective extra info:
MICROSOFT.WINDOWS.7.BUILD.7264.WIN7_RTM.X86.ENGLISH.DVD-VINYLZINE
7264.0.090622-1900_x86fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GRMCULFRER_EN_DVD.iso
SIZE: 2,503,360,512 byte
CRC: 0B916606
MD5: 44F04E9E5762714C3D75A3C9C88DE251
SHA1: 59BA011913B00A820A1E002B9BEDEF139AE15B07
x86 Torrent Download: Click Here
MICROSOFT.WINDOWS.7.BUILD.7264.WIN7_RTM.X64.ENGLISH.DVD-VINYLZINE
7264.0.090622-1900_x64fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GRMCULXFRER_EN_DVD.iso
SIZE: 3,226,130,432 byte
CRC: 05F87B79
MD5: 670818DB149170C652414E1F75E9390C
SHA1: C6FE386E97944511820291F515A8CBB3DDA329A6
x64 Torrent Download: Click Here
-Stephen
Windows 7 Build 7264: The Road to RTM Continues…
WZor has posted a new RTM candidate build string:
6.1.7264.0.win7_rtm.090622-1900
Unlike the 7264 build string I posted about the other day (which was determined to be fake), this build is the latest candidate on the road to RTM. Along with the build string, WZor posted what are supposedly team progress bug charts/logs:

If those charts are accurate, then Windows 7 appears it definitely will not RTM on the 26th as is potentially implied by the Windows 7 Upgrade site.
More as it comes in!
Source: WZor.net
-Stephen
Windows 7 Build 7264?
I’m hearing murmurs around the community of a build 7264 which was supposedly compiled to fix a showstopper bug discovered in build 7263. The rumored build string is:
6.1.7264.0.win7_rtm.090620-1900
Whether or not it’s legit, I’m not sure. I haven’t seen it confirmed by any sources I know or trust, so I’m going to take it with a grain of salt for the moment – as should you. As far as potential evidence for it being fake, check out this coincidence:
The last 3 RTM candidates have had a compile time of 1900 hours and they’ve all been compiled within 2 days of one another on the 15th, 17th, and 19th, respectively:
6.1.7261.0.win7_rtm.090615-1900
6.1.7262.0.win7_rtm.090617-1900
6.1.7263.0.win7_rtm.090619-1900
So, basically, it would be extremely easy to have made up such a build string for this supposed 7264 build, which follows the same formula; 2 days apart, 1900 hours. Regardless, if that build is legit, I’m curious to know what the showstopper bug was that was found… and why it wasn’t discovered in any of the previous RTM candidates. Perhaps it would be due to new code created between builds 7262 and 7263 to fix bugs from previous compiles. But that’s if this build string is the real deal in the first place. =)
Anyway, more when it comes in!
-Stephen




