<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows 8 Server: Due ~2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://msftkitchen.com/2009/08/windows-8-server-due-2012.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://msftkitchen.com/2009/08/windows-8-server-due-2012.html</link>
	<description>Heard of Windows 8? Learn about Windows 8, Office 15, Windows Mobile 8 and more. The future of Microsoft, here @ MSFTKitchen: The #1 Windows 8 resource!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:35:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delphi am &#34;Ende&#34;? - Seite 31 - Delphi-PRAXiS</title>
		<link>http://msftkitchen.com/2009/08/windows-8-server-due-2012.html/comment-page-1#comment-54481</link>
		<dc:creator>Delphi am &#34;Ende&#34;? - Seite 31 - Delphi-PRAXiS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msftkitchen.com/?p=171#comment-54481</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows 8 nascer</title>
		<link>http://msftkitchen.com/2009/08/windows-8-server-due-2012.html/comment-page-1#comment-1293</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows 8 nascer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msftkitchen.com/?p=171#comment-1293</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naechste Windows-Generation mit neuem Kern im Jahr 2012 im Windowsblog &#124; Am Puls der Microsoft Betriebssysteme</title>
		<link>http://msftkitchen.com/2009/08/windows-8-server-due-2012.html/comment-page-1#comment-1279</link>
		<dc:creator>Naechste Windows-Generation mit neuem Kern im Jahr 2012 im Windowsblog &#124; Am Puls der Microsoft Betriebssysteme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msftkitchen.com/?p=171#comment-1279</guid>
		<description>[...] Bericht (externer Link) im Weblog &#8220;Microsoft Kitchen&#8221; zufolge h&#228;tten die ersten Schritte auf dem Weg zur [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bericht (externer Link) im Weblog &#8220;Microsoft Kitchen&#8221; zufolge h&#228;tten die ersten Schritte auf dem Weg zur [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kommt Windows 8 schon 2012? &#124; Scatterd</title>
		<link>http://msftkitchen.com/2009/08/windows-8-server-due-2012.html/comment-page-1#comment-1186</link>
		<dc:creator>Kommt Windows 8 schon 2012? &#124; Scatterd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msftkitchen.com/?p=171#comment-1186</guid>
		<description>[...] erfolgreichen 7 schon in den nächsten 2-3 Jahren erscheinen wird. Das geht jedenfalls aus einer Roadmap heraus, die ein nächstes &#8220;Major Release&#8221; im Jahre 2012 anzeigt. Ob das alles stimmt, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] erfolgreichen 7 schon in den nächsten 2-3 Jahren erscheinen wird. Das geht jedenfalls aus einer Roadmap heraus, die ein nächstes &#8220;Major Release&#8221; im Jahre 2012 anzeigt. Ob das alles stimmt, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows 8 to Release in 2012? &#124; Vivek&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://msftkitchen.com/2009/08/windows-8-server-due-2012.html/comment-page-1#comment-714</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows 8 to Release in 2012? &#124; Vivek&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 05:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msftkitchen.com/?p=171#comment-714</guid>
		<description>[...] Source [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jug</title>
		<link>http://msftkitchen.com/2009/08/windows-8-server-due-2012.html/comment-page-1#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator>Jug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msftkitchen.com/?p=171#comment-555</guid>
		<description>Given how popular Windows 7 seem to end up like, with shining reviews starting to pop up, I&#039;m 99% sure Windows 8 will also not only end up as just a code name. :) We&#039;ll see, but I think it&#039;s more than likely.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Actually, I think Windows 7 would&#039;ve been a Windows Vista SE, if that name just hadn&#039;t got so tainted. I always considered the quick release schedule and relatively conservative feature set of Windows 7 to in part be a way for Microsoft to get rid of the Vista brand ASAP. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given how popular Windows 7 seem to end up like, with shining reviews starting to pop up, I&#39;m 99% sure Windows 8 will also not only end up as just a code name. <img src='http://msftkitchen.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  We&#39;ll see, but I think it&#39;s more than likely.</p>
<p>Actually, I think Windows 7 would&#39;ve been a Windows Vista SE, if that name just hadn&#39;t got so tainted. I always considered the quick release schedule and relatively conservative feature set of Windows 7 to in part be a way for Microsoft to get rid of the Vista brand ASAP. <img src='http://msftkitchen.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Chapman</title>
		<link>http://msftkitchen.com/2009/08/windows-8-server-due-2012.html/comment-page-1#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msftkitchen.com/?p=171#comment-552</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@Anonymous&lt;/b&gt;: First point of mention is that, &quot;Windows 8&quot; is in reference to the codename; not the final name of the product. They may go with Windows 8 for a final product name or they may not. Bear in mind, each OS revision you listed had a codename separate from the final product (with the exception of - eventually - Windows 7, which went through a series of codenames internally before, &quot;Windows 7&quot; was chosen).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As for you finding it funny, well... funny as it may seem, it&#039;s what Microsoft is calling it internally for the time being. I have plenty of previous Windows 8-related posts that link to employees and internal documentation stating, &quot;Windows 8.&quot; For your reference:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://uxevangelist.blogspot.com/2009/04/windows-8-and-windows-9-various-tidbits.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://uxevangelist.blogspot.com/2009/04/windows-8-and-windows-9-various-tidbits.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://uxevangelist.blogspot.com/2009/06/windows-8-to-contain-new-networking.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://uxevangelist.blogspot.com/2009/06/windows-8-to-contain-new-networking.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://uxevangelist.blogspot.com/2009/05/windows-8-tracking-work-internally-with.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://uxevangelist.blogspot.com/2009/05/windows-8-tracking-work-internally-with.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-Stephen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@Anonymous</b>: First point of mention is that, &quot;Windows 8&quot; is in reference to the codename; not the final name of the product. They may go with Windows 8 for a final product name or they may not. Bear in mind, each OS revision you listed had a codename separate from the final product (with the exception of &#8211; eventually &#8211; Windows 7, which went through a series of codenames internally before, &quot;Windows 7&quot; was chosen).</p>
<p>As for you finding it funny, well&#8230; funny as it may seem, it&#39;s what Microsoft is calling it internally for the time being. I have plenty of previous Windows 8-related posts that link to employees and internal documentation stating, &quot;Windows 8.&quot; For your reference:</p>
<p><a href="http://uxevangelist.blogspot.com/2009/04/windows-8-and-windows-9-various-tidbits.html" rel="nofollow">http://uxevangelist.blogspot.c.....dbits.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://uxevangelist.blogspot.com/2009/06/windows-8-to-contain-new-networking.html" rel="nofollow">http://uxevangelist.blogspot.c.....rking.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://uxevangelist.blogspot.com/2009/05/windows-8-tracking-work-internally-with.html" rel="nofollow">http://uxevangelist.blogspot.c.....-with.html</a></p>
<p>-Stephen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhys</title>
		<link>http://msftkitchen.com/2009/08/windows-8-server-due-2012.html/comment-page-1#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msftkitchen.com/?p=171#comment-551</guid>
		<description>Whether or not its funny, its showing up in official Microsoft documentation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether or not its funny, its showing up in official Microsoft documentation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://msftkitchen.com/2009/08/windows-8-server-due-2012.html/comment-page-1#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msftkitchen.com/?p=171#comment-550</guid>
		<description>@Rhys&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;windows xp? windows vista? windows 7? if you have a look all the names weren&#039;t same. xp to vista to 7. so 7 to 8? thats a little bit funny dont you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rhys</p>
<p>windows xp? windows vista? windows 7? if you have a look all the names weren&#39;t same. xp to vista to 7. so 7 to 8? thats a little bit funny dont you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhys</title>
		<link>http://msftkitchen.com/2009/08/windows-8-server-due-2012.html/comment-page-1#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 02:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msftkitchen.com/?p=171#comment-548</guid>
		<description>@Anon, it wasn&#039;t photoshopped. This is from an official MS presentation. And whatever &quot;your views&quot; are, there have been Windows 8-related job postings.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;IMHO, the really interesting thing about this is that Windows 8 (or its server variant) is on track as a major release. My understanding was that before 7&#039;s release Microsoft was planning on future Windows releases being incremental, a la Mac OS. Correct me if I&#039;m wrong on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anon, it wasn&#39;t photoshopped. This is from an official MS presentation. And whatever &quot;your views&quot; are, there have been Windows 8-related job postings.</p>
<p>IMHO, the really interesting thing about this is that Windows 8 (or its server variant) is on track as a major release. My understanding was that before 7&#39;s release Microsoft was planning on future Windows releases being incremental, a la Mac OS. Correct me if I&#39;m wrong on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

